Academia.eduAcademia.edu
The Bulletin of Thc Association for Rornan Archacology Cover Photo. ! Antinoopolis:'Tondo'' of the Two Brothers'. Encaustic on panel, diam.61cm. Egyptian Museum, Cairo. see page Photo: @ 40. Lucinda Douglas-Menzies. 'urnasnn ellLlslcl,l JeM aqllo uolssluJad rq :Jalsaclv '^euqneo uepv O 'aulaqcs saNnbBuv alqeuod :dof llo^\Lllou :soloqd 'slc!/vue lalseclv pue 'scu11 'dol lleltqlou A Fulpnlcur'salts l.lslluE-oueulou ulol, suodeairr ezuolq eJnleluly! eql'q4sllod 'r'Fu ;o qdacuoc pcr6olodo;qlue qllAr palJeuuoc spa[qo fep ol feP ;o suoncnPo.lda.l aleJS-llBtus yo lsrsuoc faql 'uollsJlpap pesl pta6 'sauBnlJIIES ultPIA slrd aperu-uutu q osp lnq 'sJxaluoJ spatqo IBJnlBu ul ep?ur uago a-lamsltsodaP esaql'sJaqlunu a8rel f;arr uI ua+o 'sleruluE plre sueunq paJEFJesJo suEIuaJ aql pue ('c1a';nouue'sleads 'splalqs 'spro,ts) ,(1ooq rern se 1a,u' su 'su1oc;algs Pue P1oElo sass?Iu 1fia11arrraf 'sanb.ro1 leuosrad;o aseqd puoJas sHl o] spoo8 aEnsa.td ;o,{1aEre1 palslsuoc uonysodap prqlr JoJ uesoqc sPafqo Eur8uolaqse uaas aq1 dgeuoDtpe.q aru s6uua;;o elnol pesunl?ruItr tr JnoAeJ e JoJ flqeqoJd qJIq \'suoJplnBc sJnJeluru 97 pue splalqs eJnJBIuIu ?z pepnlJul spBJau? ezuorq 01 a13p rlrolslqerd Jo prBoq frnqsllBs snounJ aILI' (plags e)'sr1c1i*:e16 'relseclvPuB (Pta1qs PIrB Proil\s azuo.lq)'uoxo'proJllr.{' (sp1a1qs) lua>I'tPJolA' (sreads)'uoxo 'uoluepool\ EuPnlcut'upllJg ul Jeqlunu e lB PunoJ uaeq aABq ezuoJq uI splelqs puE sa11s f:en1cu?s Jo suodean a:n1eru{ l 'aloqe pessncslp esues eql q tou lnq'salnlnsqns se poolsJapun eq ueJ'suloc pue d.rallaruat arnleppu ;o salduruxa eJeJ ul4JeJ s3 IIaA\ se '(t 'EL{) druodearr pasyqelutut fPg 'a.rn1c1d Paleclldtuoc eJoIIJ JBJ 3 sIeeAeJ larrarnoq 'adr{1 pug aqtJo fpnls resolr v'spo6 aq1 o1 sgp aleudo.rdde flrepcn:ed uraql epeur qJILU( lo r(1leuopcury-uou eql 'suopeclpeP letceds atrxa Sutaq se aleq sPafqo PeslJn1elu1ur '{arneurallY' alecpep ol PToJJB esllrJargo tou ppoc faql slcafqo aql uaes uaeq I s.laddtqs.lom Jo slepour ol pegoseJ (drqsreloqcs xopoquo o1 Sutprocce) suoBclnsal cnuouoJa JO aJq aw uI ,lnuapl dno:EJo uonslurgls aql puB'f1uoq1ne I?IJos Jo uonJess? aul Ip e Eulsluo;d - r'rorr e Eurle1;apun;o 3 01 pJe.&\eJ 'a8y uo.l1 ueurog-a;d aq1u1 '6uua;;o e qo^PeslJn1e1uyu aql st a8truqc leql ol PalJeuuoc uauo sl 13q1 a&i1pe;a1re 1ue1;odtut auo 'uonlsodap pqu ut aEueqc uJnleJ ut rar*od ll plo8 Eu1pnlcul pa1e1a-r e dq Patueduoccu sl eJlJo ueuog .peslllllJ, ? 01 seJnlJn-qs FqL4 rqleS uro-g tlrtlil\s arp lsan derrr eql IuJEtuoJ u?Iuou aql uI aJer{ \esle pw'urglufl uetuog uI'elun JaAo ace1d 4oo1 1uq1 sa8ueqc eql pue lurqlr luelruu lnoq? satunlol {eeds ol pPualod eql arreq (,{paruasaP Pue spug eseql's1xa1uoc lecpoloauqc;e allJ usurou pIuJoJ aql;o uondoPe {Euqyn,ttolsq JIeW uFlltitr Pue 'dlecqeuralsds peilury, - or!'nM. suaqq tlaps tr\l'ISA- elnturoJ sqlJo suorlBlr?A pepnls uell!\'sl3BJalJ? Jo sJequnu snoluJoua Jo uoneuasa;d aq1 q pelFSaJ suq qxaluoc fJe1ellt Pue peqlJosul'a:nldpcs p:n5g Eutpnlcut uago'quarunuou auols Jo IeAIJJ? eq1fpueyodlul erol tr 'peterlpep eq 'selec's1td'sagenlcuus uI spafqo uonBrrpap puonuslul eql'&l prB M.ryoa) pue rolurrpep eqlJo etusu eql qll \ o1 ul8aq osP s8uu-;aEug PUB eelnqg sB rpns'ssa-lP Puos:ad;o sluetuale :a1du15'sezuoJq uop€u$uouap il?rus aJ? qJlqi{f\Jo r$yofuut eql'suloc FnpI pulJo suogertpap fq paceldar aJe suloJJaAIS pue ploC'uogtsodap a qolpesfleuos.tad sJoIuJo esu aql pug e 4.'p?elsul 'suonmlpap anpl q8rq Paluarrard suoqlpuoc cguouoca l\eu Pu?'uogtsodaP JoJ elqele^B:a8uo1 ou aJerY\ stuqJIA wtunq pw r$ooq re11 fiectpeJ paEueqc aleq ol sueas a.lnPtd eql 'q las eg1;o fem ueuou B sV 'rqpuepl dno:8;o uorleluJgIs PUB rilpoqlne IeIJosJo uoluesse eql pue q4epod ;o qdacuoc lecpolodo.lqlue q1r r pepeuuoc {eleurPPal almb uaeq seq pu?'uosrun tn Euqce sdno;6 a;qua dq:o ',(1a1cos;o sJeqlueu a1le aq1 fq ue{spePun uaeq {a411sou Plnotu uoPtsodaP I?nllJ Jo Uos sg;'uoPtsodaP olroyd uoqcn-qsap PquJo elu B uI luaq Jo Pa>1ceq fPuanba4 a;a,n aneq ununNx lnlqa tq Jo sno1811a: lualcue EutpuulsJepun Jo Pa8:aua seq uoDtsodaP FnlrJo fpnts eqpql fPuaca-t flannuedruoc {uo s111 'up}lrg su?ar.u B se u?ruo5 ut uotEga;1noq? uonetuJoful se fqde;Eouoct Jo saJJnos uletu JIaID pIIB slxal luetcue'suoBducsut 'a;n1ca11qc;e aldural uo elu4uacuoc 01 pepuel slstSoloaeqc;e'lsed aql uI 'paruaddu Pn[ seq'sPerP qq4 FraqlePlag slq ruo.g Padola,raP 's8u.ua;;o oapoa oJrqelulur uo {ooq sIH 'EqurnloJ rlsplrg ;o r(lrsrarrrun atpls sarDnls sno6Seg PUB uralssil ruaN 'pc1ssu13 ;o luau4redaq aql uI r$oIIoJ IsropoP-lsod u s1 all 'sp(sluor snoPger uro.ry sPuSJo solJas luq.roduq us sossncsrD 's4sodaP aaso uo lred:re SqPuele'usulerrr dryqa 'uo6gar oapeu PrrB rrBIuoU ol iupela.r salJoaoJsro iuPuulcsu; Jo roqumu tm.searcrq arp rDIA\ suggesting exhibition, perhaps by nailing to the temple wall. The single context ofthe finds, the early dating, and the ritual mutilation all seem to support an idea of these miniatures as being used as substitutes for acfualwarbooty, butthe enormous pile of them seemsto comply with the old idea of acommunalor elite-level rite. Finds of enormous groups ofclay and lead coin-sized tokens at temple sites in Germanyand Fig.2. Miniature iron weapons from Mouzon. Mus6e de I'Ardenne. Scale: 1 : 1.2. Photo: O Philip Kiernan. the late Iron Age. Very recently, the Portable Antiquities Scheme recorded a hoard offive spearheads, four swords and atleast 13 miniafure bronze shields from a probable sanctuary site at RothwellTop, Lincs. In manycases, these miniatures had been intentionally bent or otherwise damaged. Very few miniature weapons in Britainwere found in straffied contexts, though it is signfficant that they are generally found in sanctuaries, and that the forms of the weapons imitated are usually based on recognisably Iron Age prototypes. To best understand them, we must look to a parallel find of more than' 500 miniature iron swords, spears and shields made at the sanctuary site of Mouzon in France. The site included preRoman levels in which iron weapons and shield bosses were found (Fig. 2). At some point in the late first century BC, or very early in France suggest a similar replacementfor the IronAge tradition of dedicating precious metal coins, but again, the idea of individualised substitution is missing. Practically all other objects that have been classified as miniafurised votive offerings find quite different explanations, but shared types are sometimes found oververy large areas, suggesting a certain element of continuity in religious practice. The best example of this is the miniature bronze ixe (Fig. 3), most of which range from 3 to 6cm in length, though longer examples in iron are known in Switzerland. At least 87 of these miniature axes have been found in Britain, compared to 39 in France, and 79 in Switzerland. The numbers probably reflect reporting and research habits more than actual density, and it is fair to see the dedication of miniature axes as a universal phenomenon in the Roman west, stretching from the Alps to Britain. Afew examples come from late preRoman contexts, but most axe models come from the first or second cenfuries AD. Many bear simple decoration, such asX's or lines, though a few Swiss specimens have been inscribed with the names of individuals, deities, and thevotive formula VSLM, clearly placing the models into the realm of personal dedication. The significance of the miniature axes is less clear, and several hypotheses have been proposed. The idea of them as substitutes for the tools of ancient craftsmen, however, is simply not plausible, for the simple reason that life-sized axe-heads, or indeed other tools, are quite rare finds on sancfuary sites. Miranda AldhouseGreen saw them as dedications to a Celtic solar deity on the basis of the inscribed markings, while Martin Henig has argued that they are representations ofthe axe used in Roman animal sacrifices. Axes were also symbols of divine and human authority, and axeswere carried by the lictors who accompanied Roman magistrates. In a number of French sanctuaries where the axe models have been found, Neolithic and BronzeAge axe heads have also been recovered - in one case grouped with the bronze model in a small pit. These artefacts musthave been found in Roman the first century AD, the miniaturised weapons were placed in a single heap near the front door of one of the sanctuary's three main temple buildings. Some had been ritually bent, and others have nail holes, Fig. 3. Miniature axes from British temple sites. From left to right: Woodeaton, Asthall, Alcester and Chinham. All bronze. Photo: Ashmolean Museum, O Philip Kieman. times and brought to the temple as puzzling antiquities. They are not mere intrusions from earlier strata. The association of the models and the prehistoric artefacts may be mere coincidence, and it seems untkely that these Stone Age and Bronze Age artefacts were recognised as axe heads in the Roman period. On the other hand, most of the axe models from Switzerland copy an IronAge socketed-axe form, rather than the Roman style hafted axe. Other miniature votive offering types require detailed consideration before a convincing argument as to their meaning or function can be proposed. Some seem to represent elements taken from the iconography of particular deities, and have nothing to do with the actual objects they represent. The most important instance of this type was the miniature wheel, which reproduced the chief athibute of a Romano-Celtic solar deity. In the case of votive pottery and containers, it is often unclear whether one is dealing with a miniaturised form or small specimens of functional objects. Small pots mightbe used to hold small offerings of food or drink, or for drinking sips of holy water from sacred springs. In a similarvein, tiny but functional fibulae are more likely to have worked as fasteners for fine garments or for children than to have been produced specifically as dedications. The amount of work required to produce them would have eliminated any saving in material costs. A number of small bronze and iron hammers and tongs have been identified asvotives, but finds of these objects in metal workshops suggest that they were actually the functional tools of fine smiths. The old adage that archaeologists always interpret what they cannot explain as'religious' seems to be doubly true for small items. Often thought of as a single homogeneous group, miniature votive offerings actually form a number of different groups, stemming fr om different periods, and serving differentfunctions. A few seem to have replaced Iron Age rites of mass dedications of war booty and prestige goods, though the idea of substifution at a personal level seems nonexistent. Other miniatures reproduce divine symbols, and many finds interpreted as votive offerings are more likely to have served purely practical functions. The diversity of miniature votive offering is astounding, and so is the amount of information that they yield about votive activity. It seems likely that other offering types and artefacts, if studied in a similarmanner, will reveal an equallyvaried picfure. For the archaeologist, the true value of miniafure -, . - votive offerings is the newelementtheyaddto i iS our understanding of I iii l SELECT BIBLIOGRAPIIY Bradley, R, 1990The Passage ofArms. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Forrer, R, 1948 Die helaetischen und helaetoriimischen Votiobeilchen der Schweiz. Schriften des Institutes flir Ur- und Friihgeschichte der Schweiz 5. Basel. Green, M., 1975 RomanoBritish nonceramic model objects in South-East Britain. Antiq.I.I32.54-70. Green, M., 1981 Model objects from military areas of Roman Britain. Britannia 12.253-269. Green, M., l984The Wheel as a Cult-Symbol in the Romano-Cehic World. latomus, Brussels. Henig, M., 1984 Religion in Roman Britain. Batsford, Iondon. Kiernan, P, 2007 Symbols and Substitutes: Some Observations on Rifual Model Objects from the Roman North-West. In Continuity and Innoaation in Religion in the Rornan tyest. Edited by R Haeussler and A C. King.J. RomanArchaeol., Supp. Series 67. 153-176. Portsmouth, Rhode Island. Kiernan, P,2009 Miniature Votiae Offeings in the Roman North-West. Franz Philipp Rutzen Verlag. Ruhalpding. Kirk, J., 1949 Bronzes from Woodeaton, Oxon. Oxonie nsia 14. L- 45. kfewe, D., 1986 Les sanctuaires gallo romains du Bois du Flavier dMouzon. Iz Pays Sedanais. New series 13. 93-115. Roymanns, N. L990 Tibal Societi* in rn Gaul. An Anthro f ologic al Penpectiae. Cingula 12. Univ. ofAmsterdam, No r the Amsterdam. Stead, I., 1991 Many more Iron Age shields from Britain..4 ntiq. l. 7 l. l- 35. i ancientreligion. .::=: Stead, L, l998The Salisbury Stroud. Hoard.Tempus,